4.6 Article

Regulating the Anode Corrosion by a Tryptophan Derivative for Alkaline Al-Air Batteries

期刊

LANGMUIR
卷 39, 期 17, 页码 6018-6028

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00032

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Screening a green corrosion inhibitor, N(alpha)-Boc-L-tryptophan (BCTO), significantly enhances the performance of Al-air batteries. BCTO effectively inhibits corrosion of Al-5052 alloy in 4 M NaOH solution, with an inhibition efficiency of 68.2% and anode utilization efficiency of 92.0% at an optimum concentration of 2 mM. The addition of 2 mM BCTO increases the capacity and energy density of the system from 990.10 mA h g-1 and 1317.23 W h kg-1 to 2739.70 mA h g-1 and 3723.53 W h kg-1, respectively. The adsorption behavior of BCTO on the Al-5052 surface was further studied using theoretical calculations. This work lays the foundation for constructing durable Al-air batteries through electrolyte regulation.
Screening a green corrosion inhibitor that can prevent Al anode corrosion and enhance the battery performance is highly significant for developing next-generation Al-air batteries. This work explores the non-toxic, environmentally safe, and nitrogen-rich amino acid derivative, N(alpha)-Boc-L-tryptophan (BCTO), as a green corrosion inhibitor for Al anodes. Our results confirm that BCTO has an excellent corrosion inhibition effect for the Al-5052 alloy in 4 M NaOH solution. An optimum inhibitor addition (2 mM) has increased the Al-air battery performance; the corrosion inhibition efficiency was 68.2%, and the anode utilization efficiency reached 92.0%. The capacity and energy density values increased from 990.10 mA h g-1 and 1317.23 W h kg-1 of the uninhibited system to 2739.70 mA h g-1 and 3723.53 W h kg-1 for the 2 mM BCTO added system. The adsorption behavior of BCTO on the Al-5052 surface was further explored by theoretical calculations. This work paves the way for constructing durable Al-air batteries through an electrolyte regulation strategy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据