期刊
LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT
卷 34, 期 10, 页码 2838-2848出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4651
关键词
environmental policy; equity; inequality; payments for environmental services; restoration; socio-economic impact
Despite global momentum in restoration activities, little attention has been paid to the socio-economic implications, with limited evidence on equity and equality outcomes. This study focuses on investigating the fairness within the Chinese Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP) and proposes a quantitative methodology to assess equity and equality. The findings reveal a shift in households' economic structure, with a decrease in farming activities and an increase in out-migration, particularly among the lowest income groups. Both equality and equity have improved, with the best outcomes in regions where the CCFP has been implemented for a longer time. The level of participation in the Program also plays a significant role in explaining income variations.
Despite global momentum in restoration activities, their socio-economic implications are little studied. Thus far, the limited evidence available tends to overlook equity and equality outcomes. In this work, we aimed at investigating fairness within the Chinese Conversion of Cropland to Forest Program (CCFP), given the relevance of local people's support for the long-term success of land restoration and for the inherent belief that equity should be pursued also by environmental policies. Additionally, we propose a methodology to investigate equity and equality, from a quantitative perspective. Our results suggested a shift in the overall households' economic structure, with the main changes being a decrease in farming activities (-44 pp) and a sharp increase in out-migration (+44 pp), with the most significant variation within the lowest income groups (-57 pp and + 75 pp, respectively). We also observed that both equality (the Gini coefficient decreased by 23%) and equity (higher income increase for low-income groups) improved, and the best enhancement happened in the regions where the CCFP has been implemented for a longer time. Moreover, data showed that the main driver of inequality was households' income deriving from remittances, both before and after the Program implementation (with concentration coefficient equal to 1.1 and 1.0, respectively) but its effect decreased over time suggesting an increase in out-migration opportunities for lower-income households. Finally, we found that the level of participation in the Program holds a quite strong explanatory power for both on-farm and off-farm income (explaining 19% and 18% of their respective variability).
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据