4.4 Article

Preparation of carbonaceous monolith from polyacrylonitrile@lignin hybrid composite and its sensing and adsorption capability

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
卷 40, 期 6, 页码 1510-1517

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-023-1389-z

关键词

Adsorption; Carbonaceous Monolith; Lignin; Polyacrylonitrile; Sensor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A carbonaceous monolith material was synthesized from polyacrylonitrile@lignin (PAN@lig) composite hybrid, and its sensing and adsorption capabilities were evaluated. The carbonization of PAN@lig produced a carbonaceous monolith with unique external and internal structures. The monolith exhibited stable structural and electrochemical properties, making it suitable for use as a sensing material and demonstrated the capacity to adsorb toxic chemicals/substances.
A carbonaceous monolith material was produced from polyacrylonitrile@lignin (PAN@lig) composite hybrid; the sensing and adsorption capabilities of the material were evaluated. Because the two carbon-based precursors, PAN and lignin, have different characteristics, the resulting carbonaceous hybrid material was expected to exhibit unique properties. The controlled carbonization of PAN@lig produced a carbonaceous monolith with characteristic external and internal structures. Electron microscopy and cyclic voltammetry analyses of the morphological and electrochemical features of the monolith revealed stable structural and electrochemical properties. The hybrid, which acted as an electrochemical capacitor because of the electrical conductivity of the monolith, was suitable for use as a sensing material. The feasibility of using the carbonaceous monolith as a sensing medium was demonstrated by extensive electrical measurements of a simple sensor geometry. The carbonaceous hybrid also demonstrated the capacity to adsorb toxic chemicals/substances, such as radioactive heavy metal ions. The adsorption behavior was analyzed using several isotherm and kinetic models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据