4.4 Article

Comparative study of enhanced catalytic properties of clay-derived SiO2 catalysts for biodiesel production from waste chicken fat

期刊

出版社

KOREAN INSTITUTE CHEMICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11814-023-1467-2

关键词

Biodiesel; Transesterification; Heterogeneous Catalyst; Animal Fat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of clay derived SiO2 catalyst impregnated with SrO, Bi2O3, CuO and CaO is an effective and efficient method for biodiesel production from waste chicken fat (WCF). By optimizing the reaction parameters, including methanol to oil ratio, catalyst loading, reaction temperature and time, a maximum biodiesel yield of 98.9% can be achieved.
The use of biodiesel is a proactive measure that can be implemented to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and other adverse environmental impacts. However, one of the major setbacks to biodiesel production is its relatively higher cost compared to petroleum diesel. The optimistic solution to this is valorization of biomasses like waste chicken fat (WCF) and clay for deriving non-edible oil and catalyst respectively. Herein, we report the synthesis of clay derived SiO2 catalyst impregnated with SrO, Bi2O3, CuO and CaO. The developed catalysts were characterized by FTIR, XRD, and SEM. XRD studies confirmed the successful impregnation of active metallic oxide on SiO2 support. Further, these catalysts were employed for biodiesel production from WCF, and SrO/SiO2 was found to be most effective and efficient catalyst for biodiesel production from WCF. Hence, SrO/SiO2 was adapted to optimize the different transesterification reaction parameters such as methanol to oil ratio, catalyst loading, reaction temperature and time. The optimized conditions for maximum biodiesel yield 98.9% were found to be 65 degrees C in 1 h with 12:1 methanol to oil ratio and 1 wt% catalyst loading. The biodiesel produced was also analyzed by GC-MS. The obtained biodiesel yield shows that clay can be a potential, and cost-effective, catalyst source to produce biodiesel from WCF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据