4.5 Review

Biological intra-articular augmentation for osteotomy in knee osteoarthritis: strategies and results A systematic review of the literature from the ESSKA Orthobiologics Initiative

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-023-07469-x

关键词

Osteotomy; Osteoarthritis; Cartilage; Knee; Injection; Augmentation; Orthobiologics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to assess the evidence supporting the use of augmentation strategies in osteotomies for knees with osteoarthritis. The study found that cartilage surgical procedures combined with osteotomies did not provide pain relief and functional recovery, while injective orthobiologic options showed promising clinical benefits. However, the quality of the available literature is limited and further research is needed to optimize the use of biologic intra-articular osteotomy augmentation.
PurposeTo assess whether there is evidence supporting the use of augmentation strategies, either cartilage surgical procedures or injective orthobiologic options, to improve the results of osteotomies in knees with osteoarthritis (OA).MethodsA systematic review of the literature was performed on the PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane databases in January 2023 on osteotomies around the knee associated with augmentation strategies (either cartilage surgical procedures or injective orthobiologic options), reporting clinical, radiological, or second-look/histological outcomes at any follow-up. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).ResultsOut of the 7650 records identified from the databases, 42 articles were included for a total of 3580 patients and 3609 knees treated; 33 articles focused on surgical treatments and 9 on injective treatments performed in association with knee osteotomy. Out of the 17 comparative studies with surgical augmentation, only 1 showed a significant clinical benefit of an augmentation procedure with a regenerative approach. Overall, other studies showed no differences with reparative techniques and even detrimental outcomes with microfractures. Regarding injective procedures, viscosupplementation showed no improvement, while the use of platelet-rich plasma or cell-based products derived from both bone marrow and adipose tissue showed overall positive tissue changes which translated into a clinical benefit. The mean modified CMS score was 60.0 +/- 12.1.ConclusionThere is no evidence to support the effectiveness of cartilage surgical treatments combined with osteotomies in terms of pain relief and functional recovery of patients affected by OA in misaligned joints. Orthobiologic injective treatments targeting the whole joint environment showed promising findings. However, overall the available literature presents a limited quality with only few heterogeneous studies investigating each treatment option. This ORBIT systematic analysis will help surgeons to choose their therapeutic strategy according to the available evidence, and to plan further and better studies to optimize biologic intra-articular osteotomy augmentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据