4.1 Article

Prevalence and Molecular Analysis of Hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) Trypanosomes in Tennessee

期刊

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
卷 59, 期 1, 页码 161-166

出版社

WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/JWD-D-22-00029

关键词

Cryptobranchus alleganiensis; eastern hellbender; Trypanosoma cryptobranchi; trypanosome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Populations of eastern hellbenders have been declining due to anthropogenic habitat disturbance and sedimentation. The impact of parasite-associated morbidity and mortality on hellbender populations is not well understood. This study detected trypanosome infection in hellbenders from Virginia, with the first report of the partial 18s rRNA sequence from hellbender trypanosomes in North America. Further research is needed to understand trypanosome epidemiology and implications for hellbender health.
Populations of eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis alleganiensis) have been declining for multiple decades because of a variety of stressors associated with anthropogenic habitat disturbance followed by riparian sedimentation. The influence of parasite-associated morbidity and mortality on wild hellbender populations is poorly understood. Research has detected widespread trypanosome infection in hellbenders in Virginia, US, with no other reported detections within the eastern hellbender's extensive range. In our study, trypanosomes mostly closely resembling Trypanosoma cryptobranchi were observed in a blood smear of a hellbender from Tennessee during a population survey. Banked whole blood from this hellbender along with 51 other hellbenders was molecularly tested for the 18s rRNA gene of amphibian trypanosomes using newly designed PCR primers. In total, 3/52 (5.8%) hellbenders were PCR- and sequence-positive for trypanosomes. This is the first report of the partial 18s rRNA sequence from hellbender trypanosomes from North America. Further research into trypanosome epidemiology and hellbender health implications is warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据