4.6 Article

Effectiveness of an elastically supported beam under the action of moving loads traversing in the opposite direction

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIBRATION AND CONTROL
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10775463231174661

关键词

Opposite moving loads; Euler-Bernoulli beam; elastically supported beam; resonances; cancellation; mode-superposition method; non-dimensional parameters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the impact mechanism of an elastically supported beam in the design of high-speed simply supported bridges under two-way sequential wheel loads. The results suggest that elastic bearings can effectively mitigate vibration in one-way crossings and certain factors such as the speed parameter ratio need to be considered in two-way traffic.
The design of high-speed simply supported bridges in critical conditions, such as road or canal crossings, is a matter of concern, particularly under two-way crossings with sequential wheel loads. Contrarily to simple classical support, elastic bearings can serve towards vibration mitigation under high speed. In this paper, a non-dimensional framework is developed to understand the impact mechanism of an elastically supported (ES) beam under the action of single as well as opposite traversing loads. A good agreement with the available literature has been confirmed for the one-way crossing using the present methodology. Moreover, a parametric study is conducted for an ES beam, in which the effects of speed parameter (eta), speed parameter ratio between two trains (R), interspatial distance between loads to the length of the bridge (epsilon), damping zeta, stiffness parameter (kappa), and traversing time difference between two trains (t( os )) are investigated. The theoretical results suggest the effective use of the ES beam under higher values of eta for one-way and R for two-way traffic. Additionally, various resonances and cancellation speed ratios under particular values of epsilon have been identified under varying values of kappa.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据