4.2 Article

Fatal balamuthosis in a Siberian tiger and a literature review of detection options for free-living amoebic infections in animals

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10406387231160771

关键词

amoeba; Balamuthia spp; meningitis; pneumonia; tigers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Free-living amoebae can cause rare diseases and death in humans and animals worldwide. Identifying the species of amoeba involved is important due to variations in exposure routes and clinical progression. This study reports a fatal infection by the free-living amoeba Balamuthia mandrillaris in a Siberian tiger, confirmed through PCR assay and sequencing. Different modalities, including PCR, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry, are often used to confirm the pathogen in these cases.
Free-living amoebae are rare causes of morbidity and mortality in humans and animals around the globe. Because the route of exposure and clinical progression of disease caused by different species of amoebae may vary in people and animals, determining the species of amoeba present is important. We describe here a fatal infection by the free-living amoeba Balamuthia mandrillaris in a Siberian tiger (Panthera tigris altaica). The 17-y-old patient had a rapid clinical decline after a peracute onset of severe lethargy, dull mentation, and anorexia. Autopsy did not identify a cause of death. Histology revealed inflammation associated with amoebic trophozoites in the brain, lungs, and iris of one eye. These amoebae were confirmed to be B. mandrillaris based on a PCR assay and sequencing. Although there are subtle morphologic differences between cyst stages of Acanthamoeba spp., B. mandrillaris, and Naegleria fowleri when present and identified on routine staining, other modalities, including PCR, immunofluorescence, electron microscopy, and immunohistochemistry, are typically utilized to confirm the pathogen involved in these cases. We review the reports of balamuthosis in animals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据