4.6 Article

Promising Effects of a Novel EP2 and EP3 Receptor Dual Agonist, ONO-8055, on Neurogenic Underactive Bladder in a Rat Lumbar Canal Stenosis Model

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 196, 期 2, 页码 609-616

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.064

关键词

urinary bladder; underactive; urinary bladder; neurogenic; spinal canal; constriction; pathological; dinoprostone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We investigated whether the novel EP (prostaglandin E2) receptor agonist ONO-8055 would improve the lower urinary tract dysfunction of neurogenic underactive bladder in a rat lumbar spinal canal stenosis model. Materials and Methods: First, we studied the agonistic effect of ONO-8055 on EP receptors in EP receptor expressing CHO (Chinese hamster ovary) cells using the increase in the intracellular calcium level and intracellular cAMP (cyclic adenosine monophosphate) production as indicators of receptor activation. The effects of ONO-8055 on bladder and urethral strips from normal rats were then investigated. Finally, the effects of ONO-8055 on bladder and urethral function in rats with lumbar spinal canal stenosis were evaluated by awake cystometry and intraurethral perfusion pressure, respectively. The effects of tamsulosin and distigmine on urethral pressure were also evaluated. Results: ONO-8055 is a highly potent and selective agonist for EP2 and EP3 receptors on CHO cells. While this compound contracted bladder strips, it relaxed urethral strips. Awake cystometry showed that ONO-8055 significantly decreased bladder capacity, post-void residual urine and voiding pressure. Compared with vehicle, tamsulosin and ONO-8055 significantly decreased urethral pressure. Conclusions: ONO-8055 decreased post-void residual urine, probably by decreasing bladder capacity. The decrease in voiding pressure probably resulted from the lowered urethral pressure due to relaxation of the urethra. Thus, the novel EP2 and EP3 receptor dual agonist ONO-8055 has the potential to improve neurogenic underactive bladder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据