4.5 Review

Damage detection in composites using non-destructive testing aided by ANN technique: A review

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/08927057231172670

关键词

Composites; Non-Destructive Testing (NDT); Artificial Neural Network (ANN); Health monitoring; Acoustic Emission technique

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Damages in structures are inevitable and it is important to have effective damage detection techniques. Many engineering applications use composite materials, and common damages include delamination, fiber breakage, and fiber pull-out. Various non-destructive testing techniques have been reported for damage detection in composites, but traditional techniques are difficult to implement due to the complex properties of the materials. This study explores the use of artificial neural networks for analyzing NDT data for damage detection and discusses the pros and cons of different methods.
Damages are inevitable in structures and effective damage detection techniques are important for maintaining their health. Many weight-sensitive engineering applications use composite materials, especially fiber-reinforced laminates. Common damages of these materials include delamination, fiber breakage, fiber pull-out, etc. Various non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques are reported in the literature for damage detection in composites, such as ultrasonic testing, vibration-based techniques, acoustic emission technique, optical NDT and imagining techniques. However, due to the complex properties of composite materials, conventional techniques for analyzing NDT data are difficult to implement. In this context, artificial neural network (ANN) technique is a promising alternative for analyzing NDT data for damage detection. In this study, an attempt is made to explore the state-of-the-art of damage detection in composites using NDT aided by ANN. The work discusses the pros and cons of different methods and is expected to help in identifying the appropriate method for damage detection in composites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据