4.2 Article

The effect of PC20:0 and di-C7-PC amphiphilic surfactants on the aggregation of Aβ1-40 and Aβ1-42 using molecular dynamics simulation

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13738-023-02761-6

关键词

Alzheimer; Amyloid-beta; Aggregation; Amphiphilic surfactants; Conformational factor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper examines the interaction between amyloid-beta and two different surfactants, showing their effects on the aggregation of the protein. The calculations suggest potential interactions between peptide residues and surfactants.
At least 25 types of degenerative diseases are thought to be caused by amyloid-beta, including Alzheimer's. However, the exact mechanism of Alzheimer's is still unknown. It has been shown that amphiphilic surfactants with varying tail lengths, PC20:0 and di-C7-PC, have differing effects on the structures of A beta (1-40) and A beta (1-42). This paper examines the interaction between these surfactants and peptides. The calculations were performed at concentrations lower than the critical micelle concentration. Four and 12 peptides of beta-amyloid isomers regimens were used for each simulation. Direct and indirect behavioral effects were extensively investigated. A number of critical analyses, including RMSD, increment RMSF, P-i, and the hydration network, were performed to examine these peptides in the absence and presence of ligands. There can be a negative increment RMSF for each sequence as a result of ligand or surfactant binding to that sequence; otherwise, the structure is partially or locally folded. Demonstrated that PC20:0 and di-C7-PC amphiphilic surfactants affect the aggregation of A beta(1-40) and A beta(1-42). The results of our simulations showed that the negative values of Delta RMSF match with some P-i > 1 values for both the hydrophobic and hydrophilic sides of ligands. Therefore, potential interactions between residual peptides and ligands were identified. A negative Delta RMSF did not match the P-i > 1 value, indicating the folding behavior of peptide residues.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据