4.0 Article

The functional roles of epiphytes and arboreal soils in tropical montane cloud forests

期刊

JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 455-468

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S026646741600033X

关键词

biomass; dispersal; hydrology; interception; nutrient cycling; pollination; reproductive biology; water storage

类别

资金

  1. National Science Foundation
  2. Franklin and Marshall College
  3. University of Utah
  4. Direct For Biological Sciences
  5. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems [1556289] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Integrative Organismal Systems
  7. Direct For Biological Sciences [1556319] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Epiphytes and their associated decomposing litter and arboreal soils (herein, epiphytic material, EM) are ubiquitous features of tropical montane cloud forests (TMCF) and play important roles in ecosystem function. EM intercepts water and nutrients from the atmosphere and from intercepted host tree sources, and may contribute significant inputs of these resources to the forest floor. Despite the importance of EM in the TMCF, a systematic review of the ecosystem roles of EM has not been compiled before. We have synthesized the literature that documents functions of EM in undisturbed TMCFs and discuss how these roles may be affected by disturbances, including changes in climate and land use. The range of EM biomass and water storage in the TMCF varies greatly across sites, with different amounts associated with stand age and microclimate. EM is important as habitat and food for birds and mammals, with over 200 species of birds documented as using EM in the Neotropics. Given its sensitivity to moisture, projected shifts in cloud base heights or precipitation due to changes in climate will likely have a large impact on this community and changes in EM diversity or abundance may have cascading impacts on the ecosystem function of the TMCF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据