4.6 Review

Review-Bibliometrics and Current Research Trends on Direct Carbon-Solid Oxide Fuel Cells Utilizing Biomass as Fuel

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/accb6d

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides a bibliometric analysis and recent developments on using biochar as fuel in the DC-SOFC, after adopting thermochemical conversion and activation methods. The dominant researchers from different countries and their contributions to the development of DC-SOFC are reported. The study also discusses the physicochemical characteristics of biochar and its effects on the electrochemical performance of DC-SOFC when used as fuel. The data reveals that other biomasses can also be used as DC-SOFC fuel through pyrolysis.
Biomass is considered a viable alternative source of energy after thermochemical conversion techniques and activation methods are adopted for its conversion to biochar and activated carbon, respectively. This work provides the bibliometrics and recent developments on DC-SOFC using biochar as fuel and is further enhanced through the carbon activation method. This study reported the dominant researchers from different countries and their contributions to the development of DC-SOFC. This study provided an overview of the physicochemical characteristics of the biochar and its corresponding effect in the operation of a DC-SOFC in terms of the electrochemical performance when used as fuel. Data reveal that other biomasses can still be pyrolyzed and used as DC-SOFC fuel. This paper includes that among the alternative carbon fuels to date, pomelo peel char has the most efficient and effective biochar fuel for DC-SOFC, which yields the best output in terms of parameters such as peak power density and fuel utilization rate. The activation method, as applied in biochar fuel, is an effective way to enhance the performance of the fuel cell. Prospects and challenges addressing identified gaps for DC-SOFC with high power output operated with biomass as fuel are similarly discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据