4.6 Article

Neutron Imaging Experiments to Study Mass Transport in Commercial Titanium Felt Porous Transport Layers

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acd7a8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, neutron imaging was used to visualize and study invasion phenomena in fibrous porous transport layers (PTLs) of titanium felt under different flow conditions of gas and liquid phase. The invasion process was characterized by counter-current flow of water and air with joint imbibition and drainage processes. Neutron radiography and tomography were used to visualize the dynamics and study the static gas-liquid distributions. The results showed that the invasion occurred in repeated imbibition/drainage cycles, with frequencies depending on the flow conditions and the PTL structure.
In this work, neutron imaging was used to visualize and study invasion phenomena in fibrous porous transport layers (PTLs) of titanium felt under different flow conditions of gas and liquid phase. The experiments were realized with flow cells that contained a gas and a liquid flow channel separated by PTLs with different thicknesses and pore size distributions. The invasion can be characterized by counter-current flow of water and air with joint imbibition and drainage processes. The dynamics were visualized with neutron radiography with a local resolution of 6.5 & mu;m and a temporal resolution of 0.1 s. Individual static gas-liquid distributions were additionally studied by neutron tomography, with a local resolution of 22 & mu;m and an exposure time of 1.5 s per image (projections: 800/360 & DEG;). It is shown and discussed that the invasion occurred in continuously repeated imbibition/drainage cycles with frequencies depending on the flow conditions and the PTL structure as well. The change of the PTL saturation with air or water appeared almost independent from the specific PTL structure and the breakthrough of the gas phase occurred at almost constant positions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据