4.6 Article

Effects of Chloride Ions on Passive Oxide Films Formed on Cr-Fe-Co-Ni(-Mo) Multi-Principal Element Alloy Surfaces

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/accb10

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composition and stratification of passive oxide films on multi-principal element alloys were investigated using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry surface analysis. The results showed that the alloys with Mo exhibit higher stability in Cl--containing solutions compared to the Mo-free alloy. Furthermore, pre-passivation in Cl--free conditions and Mo addition enhance the resistance of these alloys to passivity breakdown.
The composition and stratification of the passive oxide films formed on three Cr-Fe-Co-Ni(-Mo) multi-principal element alloys by electrochemical anodic passivation in sulfuric acid electrolyte containing 0.2 and 4.7 M NaCl were investigated, combining X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry surface analysis. The passive films show a bilayer structure similar to that formed in Cl--free electrolyte with an inner layer mostly consisting of Cr oxide and an outer layer containing of Cr hydroxide, Ni hydroxide, Mo oxides, and Fe (hydr)oxide. The Mo-free alloy exhibits a thickening of the inner Cr oxide layer and the thinning of the outer layer in 0.2 M Cl-, whereas the two Mo-containing alloys do not show significant alteration even in 4.7 M Cl- evidencing their higher stability in Cl--containing solutions. The chloride penetration is limited to the external part of the outer oxide layer, except in the most severe tested conditions where traces reach the inner barrier layer, and the chloride entry into the layer is strongly reduced after pre-passivation in Cl--free solution. The results allow us to discuss the beneficial effects of pre-passivation in Cl--free conditions and Mo addition providing these alloys enhanced resistance to passivity breakdown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据