4.6 Article

Tailored Fabrication of Defect-Rich Ion Implanted CeO2-x Nanoflakes for Electrochemical Sensing of H2O2

期刊

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1945-7111/acd41f

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-enzymatic CeO2-based biosensors are an alternative to H2O2 enzymatic biosensing devices, offering improved sensibility, robustness, and shelf lives. The redox capability in CeO2 and rapid switching between its oxidation states facilitate the formation of structural vacancy defects that serve as active sites. This study presents a novel approach for synthesizing defect-rich CeO2-x-based nanoflakes through controllable low-temperature electrochemical deposition followed by low-energy ion implantation. The Mo-implanted CeO2-x nanoflakes exhibited exceptional sensitivity, high sensing stability, and electronic conductivity due to valence charge transfer and defect-induced midgap states.
As an alternative to H2O2 enzymatic biosensing devices, non-enzymatic CeO2-based biosensors have shown improved sensibility, robustness, and shelf lives. The redox capability in CeO2 and rapid switching between its oxidation states facilitate the formation of structural vacancy defects that serve as active sites. This work reports a novel approach for synthesis of defect-rich CeO2-x-based nanoflakes using a controllable electrochemical-based deposition at low temperatures (45 degrees-65 degrees C) followed by low-energy ion implantation. Among the nanoflakes, Mo-implanted CeO2-x exhibited outstanding sensitivity of 4.96 x 10(-5 )A center dot mM(-1) cm(-2) within the linear range of 0.05-10 mM. Moreover, the ion-implanted samples yielded high sensing stability and electronic conductivity. The former was achieved through the multi-valence charge transfer between Ce and the implanted ions that caused the reduction of Gibbs free energies required for the formation/retention of the defects. The latter was due to the narrowing of the electronic bandgap of CeO2-x by creation of defect-induced midgap states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据