4.6 Article

Independence Weights for Causal Inference with Continuous Treatments

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2023.2213485

关键词

Balancing weights; Confounding; Distance covariance; Electronic health records; Observational data

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studying the causal effects of continuous treatments is crucial but limited to observational studies, leading to the issue of confounding. Weighting approaches are employed to address confounding, but they are sensitive to model misspecification when it comes to continuous treatments. In this article, the authors propose a measure to eliminate confounding and a new model-free method for weight estimation. The theoretical properties and empirical effectiveness of the proposed approach are examined, demonstrating its robustness in various scenarios.
Studying causal effects of continuous treatments is important for gaining a deeper understanding of many interventions, policies, or medications, yet researchers are often left with observational studies for doing so. In the observational setting, confounding is a barrier to the estimation of causal effects. Weighting approaches seek to control for confounding by reweighting samples so that confounders are comparable across different treatment values. Yet, for continuous treatments, weighting methods are highly sensitive to model misspecification. In this article we elucidate the key property that makes weights effective in estimating causal quantities involving continuous treatments. We show that to eliminate confounding, weights should make treatment and confounders independent on the weighted scale. We develop a measure that characterizes the degree to which a set of weights induces such independence. Further, we propose a new model-free method for weight estimation by optimizing our measure. We study the theoretical properties of our measure and our weights, and prove that our weights can explicitly mitigate treatment-confounder dependence. The empirical effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated in a suite of challenging numerical experiments, where we find that our weights are quite robust and work well under a broad range of settings. for this article are available online.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据