4.8 Article

Stepwise Assembly of Quinary Multivariate Metal-Organic Frameworks via Diversified Linker Exchange and Installation

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 145, 期 25, 页码 13929-13937

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.3c03421

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By reducing the size of the primary ligand, we synthesized NPF-320, a Zr-MOF with optimized pocket sizes. This MOF allows for the post-synthetic installation of three secondary linkers in all six permuted sequences, forming a quinary MTV-MOF. With the functionalization of these linkers, we can construct MTV-MOFs with variable porosity and unprecedented complexity and encoded synthetic sequence information.
Multivariate MOFs (MTV-MOFs) constructed from multiplecomponentswith atomistic precision hold the promise for many fascinating developmentsin both fundamental sciences and applications. Sequential linker installationcan be an effective method to introduce different functional linkersinto an MOF that contains coordinatively unsaturated metal sites.However, in many cases, these linkers must be installed accordingto a specific sequence and the complete synthetic flexibility andfreedom is yet to be realized. Here, we rationally decreased the sizeof the primary ligand used in NPF-300, a Zr-MOF with scu topology (NPF = Nebraska Porous Framework), and synthesized itsisostructure, NPF-320. NPF-320 exhibits optimized pocket sizes whichallow for the post-synthetic installation of three secondary linkersin all six permuted sequences via both linker exchange and installation,forming a final quinary MTV-MOF via single-crystal-to-single-crystaltransformation. With the functionalization of the linkers from thequinary MOF system, one will be able to construct MTV-MOFs not onlywith variable porosity but also with unprecedented complexity andencoded synthetic sequence information. The utility of sequentiallinker installation was further demonstrated by the construction ofa donor-acceptor pair-based energy transfer system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据