4.8 Article

BODIPY-Based Photothermal Agents with Excellent Phototoxic Indices for Cancer Treatment

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c11650

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports six novel and easily accessible BODIPY-based agents for cancer treatment that exhibit both photodynamic and photothermal activities, and do not rely on the generation of reactive oxygen species for cytotoxicity. These agents demonstrate high photocytotoxicity and low dark toxicity in different cancer cell lines. Under hypoxic conditions, they exhibit oxygen-independent photothermal mechanisms, making them potential candidates for overcoming limitations in current cancer therapy.
Here, we report six novel, easily accessible BODIPY-based agents for cancer treatment. In contrast to established photodynamic therapy (PDT) agents, these BODIPY-based compounds show additional photothermal activity and their cytotoxicity is not dependent on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). The agents show high photocytotoxicity upon irradiation with light and low dark toxicity in different cancer cell lines in 2D culture as well as in 3D multicellular tumor spheroids (MCTSs). The ratio of dark to light toxicity (phototoxic index, PI) of these agents reaches striking values exceeding 830,000 after irradiation with energetically low doses of light at 630 nm. The oxygen-dependent mechanism of action (MOA) of established photosensitizers (PSs) hampers effective clinical deployment of these agents. Under hypoxic conditions (0.2% O2), which are known to limit the efficiency of conventional PSs in solid tumors, photocytotoxicity was induced at the same concentration levels, indicating an oxygen-independent photothermal MOA. With a PI exceeding 360,000 under hypoxic conditions, both PI values are the highest reported to date. We anticipate that small molecule agents with a photothermal MOA, such as the BODIPY-based compounds reported in this work, may overcome this barrier and provide a new avenue to cancer therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据