4.3 Article

Integrating battery and capacitive materials for efficient sodium and chloride capture

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE ELECTROCHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 6, 页码 1423-1431

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-023-05510-0

关键词

Dual-ion electrochemical deionization; Battery electrode materials; Capacitive electrode materials; MOF-derived carbon; Prussian blue; Bismuth oxychloride

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capacitive deionization (CDI) has been considered as a novel technology to relieve freshwater shortages. However, due to the limited physical adsorption capacity, the salt removal capacity remains low. To enhance the desalination capacity, a dual-ion electrochemical deionization (DEDI) device with a Prussian blue/carbon framework (PB/CF) and BiOCl/CF materials was developed. The system showed high desalination capacity, cycling stability, and rapid desalination, making it a promising solution for future desalination designs.
Capacitive deionization (CDI) has been considered as a novel technology to relieve freshwater shortages. However, due to the limited physical adsorption capacity, the salt removal capacity remains low. To enhance the desalination capacity, battery type, and capacitive materials are employed to fabricate a dual-ion electrochemical deionization (DEDI) device. Herein, a Prussian blue/carbon framework (PB/CF) and BiOCl/CF were prepared by in situ conversion with a MOF-derived carbon framework as the precursor. A PB/CF composite was used as the sodium electrode, and BiOCl/CF was used as the chloride electrode. This system achieved high desalination capacity, excellent cycling stability, and rapid desalination. The maximum desalination capacity was 163 mg g(-1) at 100 mA g(-1), and the desalination rate was 0.631 mg g(-1) s(-1) at a high current density of 1000 mA g(-1). The outstanding desalination performance of this system arose from the synergistic effect of combining battery materials with a carbon framework for deionization and offers potential for future desalination designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据