4.6 Article

Structural features, thermal stability and catalytic implication of Fe-Ni nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.123863

关键词

Fe -Ni nanoparticle; Structural features; Thermal stability; Catalytic implication; Angular-dependent potential

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We performed Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations on FexNi1-x nanoparticles, investigating their structural features and thermal stability. The simulation results showed that the surface composition of the nanoparticles varied with x, and the arrangement of Fe and Ni atoms was alternate inside the nanoparticles. The melting temperature of the nanoparticles exhibited a non-monotonic dependence on x. Furthermore, we discussed the catalytic performance of the nanoparticles in methane dry reforming, and found that Fe0.375Ni0.625 nanoparticles demonstrated the best catalytic activity, carbon deposition resistance, and sintering resistance.
We have carried out Monte Carlo and molecular dynamics simulations on FexNi1-x nanoparticles (NPs), and systematically studied their structural features and thermal stability. The required potential adopted the angular-dependent potential, which was newly obtained by us. It is found that when x < 0.375, the surface of FexNi1-x NPs is completely occupied by Ni atoms. When x > 0.375, the surface Fe concentration gradually increases with the increase of x. Inside the NPs, Fe atoms occupy the subsurface preferentially, and the Fe atom layer and Ni atom layer are arranged alternately. With the increase of x, the melting temperature of FexNi1-x nanoparticle first as-cends, then descends near x = 0.375, and then rises again near x = 0.875. In addition, the catalytic performance of FexNi1-x NPs in methane dry reforming was discussed. Considering the catalytic activity, carbon deposition resistance and sintering resistance, Fe0.375Ni0.625 NPs are the best choice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据