4.6 Article

Zn substituted Li4P2S6 as a solid lithium-ion electrolyte for all-solid-state lithium batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF SOLID STATE CHEMISTRY
卷 320, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.123861

关键词

Thio-phosphate material; Lithium -ion conductor; Solid electrolyte; All -solid-state battery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports on the application of Zinc-substituted Li4P2S6 as a Li-ion conductor, which showed significantly improved ionic conductivity compared to unsubstituted Li4P2S6. The improvement was achieved by generating Li-ion deficiency through Zn substitution, enabling Li ions to hop within the crystal structure. The diffusion pathways of Li ions were found to be mostly two-dimensional in this structure.
Li-ion conductors are pivotal materials for all-solid-state Li batteries requiring high energy densities and operational safety. PS4-based thio-phosphate materials have been intensively investigated as solid electrolytes; however, studies on more stable P2S6-based materials are scarce. We herein report on the application of Zn-substituted Li4P2S6, Li4-2xZnxP2S6, as a Li-ion conductor. Owing to the slightly smaller ionic radius of Zn2+ than Li+, the unit cell volume decreases gradually upon Zn substitution without introducing significant structural changes. However, the ionic conductivity of the substitution phase was improved by 104 times (3.8 x 10-6 S cm-1) at x = 0.75 compared to unsubstituted Li4P2S6, which was achieved by generating deficiency on the Li sites via substitution. Such Li-ion deficient site enables Li ions to hop from one site to another in the crystal structure. The 3D diffusion pathway analysis using bond-valence-landscape-energy calculations suggests that the Li diffusion pathways are mostly two-dimensional in the ab plane in this structure. This study shows that an appropriate Li defect concentration within a given structure is critical to improving ionic conductivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据