4.5 Article

Structure and aggregation behavior of pertechnetate/perrhenate in organic phase in the extraction by tributyl phosphate

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10967-023-08885-6

关键词

Extraction; Pertechnetate; Perrhenate; Tributyl phosphate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The extraction behavior of TcO4- and ReO4- by TBP in n-dodecane from HNO3 and HCl solutions was investigated. The results indicated that TBP interacted with [H+ReO4-(H2O)(8)] and [H+TcO4-(H2O)(8)] clusters through hydrogen bonding, suggesting the outer-sphere coordination of ReO4- and TcO4- with TBP in the organic phase.
The extraction of pertechnetate (TcO4-) and perrhenate (ReO4-) by tributyl phosphate (TBP) has been extensively studied, but the structure of the extracted species is subject to debate. In this work, the extraction behavior of TcO4- and ReO4- from both HNO3 and HCl media by TBP in n-dodecane was studied by examining the effects of acid concentration, extractant concentration, and temperature on the extraction. The two anions displayed similar extraction behavior in both the HNO3 and HCl systems, where the distribution ratio of TcO4- was slightly higher than that of ReO4-. The measurement of water content in the organic phase and dynamic light scattering were carried out, which in combination with the extraction behavior indicated that ReO4- was extracted as [H+ReO4-(H2O)(8)center dot(TBP)(4)] and formed microemulsions in the organic phase. Theoretical calculations were performed on the structure of both [H+ReO4-(H2O)(8)center dot(TBP)(4)] and [H+TcO4-(H2O)(8)center dot(TBP)(4)]. The TBP molecules interacted with the [H+ReO4-(H2O)(8)] and [H+TcO4-(H2O)(8)] clusters through hydrogen bonding between H2O and the O=P groups, i.e., ReO4- and TcO4- underwent outer-sphere coordination with TBP in the organic phase. Results in this work provide valuable insights into the structures of ReO4- and TcO4- extracted into the organic phase by TBP, and also assist in the analysis of TcO4- species in the PUREX process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据