4.6 Article

Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health

期刊

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad046

关键词

co-creation; co-design; co-production; public health; theoretical framework; theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review identifies and summarizes the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design, and co-production in public health research. A total of 10 articles were included in the review, highlighting the limited application of theories in these approaches since 2012. However, the theories described in these articles can serve as a valuable reference for developing co-approaches in future public health research.
Background There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. Methods The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March-April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. Results Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. Conclusion There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据