4.5 Article

Trust in sources of information on COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic?s first wave and incident persistent symptoms in the population-based CONSTANCES cohort: A prospective study*

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH
卷 169, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2023.111326

关键词

Risk factors; Persistent symptoms; Post-COVID condition; Media

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate the association between trust in different sources of information on COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic and the burden of incident persistent symptoms. Using data from the French CONSTANCES population-based cohort, the study found that participants with higher trust in government/journalists had fewer incident persistent symptoms at follow-up. Trust in government/journalists and medical doctors/scientists was also associated with a lower likelihood of having at least one symptom.
Objective: To examine the association between trust in different sources of information on COVID-19 at the beginning of the pandemic and the burden of incident persistent symptoms. Methods: This prospective study used data from the SAPRIS and SAPRIS-Se ' rologie surveys nested in the French CONSTANCES population-based cohort. Trust in different information sources was measured between April 6 and May 4, 2020. Persistent symptoms that emerged afterwards were self-reported between December 2020 and January 2021. The associated psychological burden was measured with the somatic symptom disorder B criteria scale (SSD-12). The analyses were adjusted for gender, age, education, income, self-rated health, SARS-CoV-2 serology tests, and self-reported COVID-19. Results: Among 20,985 participants [mean age (SD), 49.0 years (12.7); 50.2% women], those with higher trust in government/journalists at baseline had fewer incident persistent symptoms at follow-up (estimate (SE) for one IQR increase: -0.21 (0.03), p < 0.001). Participants with higher trust in government/journalists and medical doctors/scientists were less likely to have >= 1 symptom (odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for one IQR increase: 0.87 (0.82-0.91) and 0.91 (0.85-0.98), respectively). Among 3372 participants (16.1%) who reported >= 1 symptom, higher trust in government/journalists and medical doctors/scientists predicted lower SSD-12 scores (-0.39 (0.17), p = 0.02 and - 0.85 (0.24), p < 0.001, respectively), whereas higher trust in social media predicted higher scores in those with lower trust in government/journalists (0.90 (0.34), p = 0.008). These associations did not depend upon surrogate markers of infection with SARS-CoV-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据