4.4 Article

Guidance for the practical management of warfarin therapy in the treatment of venous thromboembolism

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND THROMBOLYSIS
卷 41, 期 1, 页码 187-205

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11239-015-1319-y

关键词

Anticoagulation; Warfarin; Coumadin; Venous thromboembolism; Anticoagulation clinics; Anticoagulation-related bleeding; Drug interactions; INR; Risk factors; Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC)

资金

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim
  2. Daiichi Sankyo
  3. Janssen Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious and often fatal medical condition with an increasing incidence. The treatment of VTE is undergoing tremendous changes with the introduction of the new direct oral anticoagulants and clinicians need to understand new treatment paradigms. This article, initiated by the Anticoagulation Forum, provides clinical guidance based on existing guidelines and consensus expert opinion where guidelines are lacking. Well-managed warfarin therapy remains an important anticoagulant option and it is hoped that anticoagulation providers will find the guidance contained in this article increases their ability to achieve optimal outcomes for their patients with VTE Pivotal practical questions pertaining to this topic were developed by consensus of the authors and were derived from evidence-based consensus statements whenever possible. The medical literature was reviewed and summarized using guidance statements that reflect the consensus opinion(s) of all authors and the endorsement of the Anticoagulation Forum's Board of Directors. In an effort to provide practical and implementable information about VTE and its treatment, guidance statements pertaining to choosing good candidates for warfarin therapy, warfarin initiation, optimizing warfarin control, invasive procedure management, excessive anticoagulation, subtherapeutic anticoagulation, drug interactions, switching between anticoagulants, and care transitions are provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据