4.6 Article

Functional characterization of a novel GFI1B mutation causing congenital macrothrombocytopenia

期刊

JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 1462-1469

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jth.13350

关键词

blood platelet disorders; GFI1B protein; human; platelet granule deficiency disorder; thrombocytopenia; transcription factors

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [26860840]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26860840, 26461413] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background GFI1B is an essential transcription factor for megakaryocyte and erythrocyte development. Two groups have recently identified GFI1B as a novel causative gene for congenital macrothrombocytopenia associated with -granule deficiency. Methods We performed whole exome sequencing and identified a novel GFI1B p.G272fsX274 mutation in a family with macrothrombocytopenia, and a decreased number of platelet -granules and abnormally shaped red blood cells. p.G272fsX274 and the previous two mutations all predicted disruption of an essential DNA-binding domain in GFI1B. We therefore performed functional studies to characterize the biochemical and biological effects of these three patient-derived mutations. Results An immunofluorescence analysis revealed decreased thrombospondin-1 and increased CD34 expression in platelets from our patient. Consistent with the previous studies, the three patient-derived mutants were unable to repress the expression of the reporter gene and had a dominant-negative effect over wild-type GFI1B. In addition, the three mutations abolished recognition of a consensus-binding site in gel shift assays. Furthermore, transduction of mouse fetal liver-derived megakaryocytes with the three GFI1B mutants resulted in the production of abnormally large proplatelet tips, which were reduced in number. Conclusions Our study provides further proof of concept that GFI1B is an essential protein for the normal development of the megakaryocyte lineage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据