4.8 Article

Unveiling Unconventional Luminescence Behavior of Multicolor Carbon Dots Derived from Phenylenediamine

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 14, 期 26, 页码 5975-5984

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01497

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multicolor fluorescent carbon dots with unconventional luminescence behavior were prepared using o-, m-, or p-phenylenediamine (o-PD, m-PD, or p-PD) and 2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene as reaction precursors. The fluorescence emission of the synthesized carbon dots followed a rule of o-PD to m-PD to p-PD from blue to red, contrary to most previously reported results. The differences in the polymerization, surface states, functional groups, and graphite N content of the carbon dots were identified as the main reasons for the unconventional luminescence behavior. These multicolor carbon dots have promising applications in LED lighting and anticounterfeiting fields.
Fluorescence regulation of carbon dots (CDs) during theirpreparationhas become a hot research topic. In this work, multicolor fluorescentCDs with unconventional luminescence behavior are prepared by using o-, m-, or p-phenylenediamine(o-PD, m-PD, or p-PD, respectively) and 2,3-dihydroxynaphthalene with rich hydroxylgroups as reaction precursors. Tunable multicolor fluorescent CDswith bright blue, yellow, and red colors can be obtained by a solvothermalmethod under the joint action of ethanol and hydrochloric acid. Thefluorescence emission of the synthesized CDs follows a rule of o-PD to m-PD to p-PD fromblue to red, which is contrary to most previously reported results(the luminescence from blue to red following an order of m-PD to o-PD to p-PD). Our resultsreveal that the differences in the polymerization, surface states,functional groups, and graphite N content of CDs might be the mainreasons for the unconventional luminescence behavior. In addition,these multicolor CDs have good applications in the fields of light-emittingdiode lighting and anticounterfeiting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据