4.6 Article

Numerical Model to Simulate Electrochemical Charging of Nanocrystal Films

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 20, 页码 9896-9902

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c01562

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, drift-diffusion simulations are used to model the electrochemical charging of nanocrystal films and investigate the limitations of this process. It is found that the concentration of the electrolyte and the applied potential affect the Fermi level and doping density in the film. The results also show that ion transport in the film is dominated by drift, rather than diffusion, which is different from classical electrochemical theory.
Electrochemical charging of nanocrystal films opens up new possibilities for designing quantum dot-based device structures, but a solid theoretical framework of this process and its limitations is lacking. In this work, drift-diffusion simulations are employed to model the charging of nanocrystal films and gain insight into the electrochemical doping process. Through steady state simulations it is shown that the Fermi level and doping density in the nanocrystal film depend on the concentration of the electrolyte in addition to the value of the applied potential. Timeresolved simulations reveal that charging is often limited by transport of electrolyte ions. However, ion transport in the film is dominated by drift, rather than diffusion, and the concentration profile of ions differs substantially from concentration profiles of diffusing redox species at flat electrodes. Classical electrochemical theory cannot be used to model this type of mass transport limited behavior in films of nanocrystals, so a new model is developed. We show that the Randles-Sevcik equation, which is derived for electrochemical species diffusing in solution, but is often applied to films as well, results in a significant underestimation of the diffusion coefficients of the charge compensating electrolyte ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据