4.6 Article

Protons Inside the LiCoO2 Electrode Largely Increase Electrolyte-Electrode Interface Resistance in All-Solid-State Li Batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 9, 页码 4684-4688

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c06620

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of an electrolyte-electrode interface that allows smooth Li-ion transport is crucial for the development of all-solid-state Li batteries. Water vapor is identified as a critical factor causing increased resistance at the interface, but the specific degradation mechanism remains unclear. This study investigates the contribution of protons to the degradation by introducing them to the LiCoO2 electrode through exposure to water vapor. Electrochemical, compositional, and structural analyses reveal that protons induce the mixing of Li and Co, leading to the formation of a low-temperature-phase LiCoO2 interphase layer that deteriorates battery performance. Understanding these interfacial phenomena enhances the power density of all-solid-state Li batteries.
Formation of an electrolyte-electrode interface that allows smooth Li-ion transport is essential for the further development of all-solid -state Li batteries. Water vapor is recognized as one critical origin of increased resistance at the electrolyte-electrode interface. However, the detailed mechanism of the degradation remains unclarified. This study uses a thin-film battery with a LiCoO2 electrode to investigate how protons at the interface contribute to the degradation. Protons were introduced to the LiCoO2 by exposing the surface to water vapor. Electrochemical, composi-tional, and structural investigations reveal that the protons induce the mixing of Li and Co during the first charging process. The mixing induces the formation of low-temperature-phase LiCoO2; this layer acts as an interphase layer that degrades battery performance. Understanding these interfacial phenomena contributes to increasing the power density of all-solid-state Li batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据