4.6 Article

Rational Design of NiO-8YSZ Screen-Printing Slurry for High- Performance Large-Area Solid Oxide Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 14, 页码 6629-6637

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c09021

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an alternative method for designing a highly active and stable fuel electrode for solid oxide cells (SOCs) application is proposed by improving the slurry dispersant effect. By optimizing the dispersants within the ink, the microstructure can be improved, leading to improved electrochemical performance of the resulting SOCs.
An efficient and stable NiO-8YSZ hydrogen electrode for solid oxide cells (SOCs) is vital in the context of increasing global intermittent renewable energy sources. Most fundamental studies of SOCs have been carried out using button cells with small active areas, whereas the screen-printing of NiO8YSZ hydrogen electrodes required for large-area SOCs have been ignored. In this study, we provide an alternative method for designing a highly active and stable fuel electrode for SOCs application by improving the slurry dispersant effect. The dispersion states and stabilities of NiO-8YSZ screen-printing slurries were quantitatively analyzed using the instability index, relaxation time, and viscosity. Scanning electron microscopy images of the resultant films indicate that the microstructure can be improved by optimizing the dispersants within the ink. The electrochemical performance of the resulting SOCs with optimized hydrogen electrode microstructures was examined at a 5 x 5 cm2 scale (16 cm2 active area). Single cells delivered a peak power density of 0.57 W center dot cm-2 at 750 degrees C in fuel cell mode and had a high current density of -0.81 A center dot cm-2 at 1.30 V in electrolysis mode. These results highlight the potential for large-scale high-performance SOCs production by designing NiO-8YSZ electrode nanostructures via a proper dispersant with the stability of screen-printing paste.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据