4.6 Article

Gradient Bundle Analysis of Electric Field Induced Changes in Electron Charge Density

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A
卷 127, 期 21, 页码 4682-4694

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.3c01757

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Applying an electric field to molecules induces rearrangement of their electron charge density. Understanding how electric fields rearrange this density is crucial for incorporating electric fields into experimental design. To gain this understanding, electric fields were applied to a set of molecules, and an analysis called gradient bundle analysis was employed to quantify the redistribution of electron charge density. The results showed relationships between the redistributed densities and various molecular properties.
Applying an electric field (EF) to a molecule is knownto inducerearrangement of its electron charge density, rho-(r). Previous experimental and computational studies have investigatedeffects on reactivity by using homogeneous EFs with specific magnitudesand directions to control reaction rates and product selectivity.To best incorporate EFs into experimental design, a more fundamentalunderstanding of how EFs rearrange rho-(r) is necessary.To gain this understanding, we first applied EFs to a set of 10 diatomicand linear triatomic molecules with various constraints on the moleculesto determine the importance of rotation and altering bond lengthson bond energies. In order to capture the subtle changes in rho-(r) known to occur from EFs, an extension of the quantum theoryof atoms in molecules called gradient bundle (GB) analysis was employed,allowing for quantification of the redistribution of rho-(r) within atomic basins. This allowed us to calculate GB-condensedEF-induced densities using conceptual density functional theory. Resultswere interpreted considering relationships between the GB-condensedEF-induced densities and properties including bond strength, bondlength, polarity, polarizability, and frontier molecular orbitals(FMOs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据