4.5 Article

Regional Zoning of a Li-Cs-Ta Pegmatite Field: Insights from Monazite-Cheralite Chemistry, U-Th-Pb and Sm-Nd Isotopes

期刊

JOURNAL OF PETROLOGY
卷 64, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/petrology/egad044

关键词

South China; Renli-Chuanziyuan; Sm-Nd isotopes; U-Th-Pb dating; LCT pegmatite deposit; granitic pegmatite; monazite-cheralite

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Renli-Chuanziyuan pegmatite field in South China shows distinct zonation and variation in mineral composition and geochemical characteristics. The in-depth analysis of minerals and isotopes indicates that the formation of the pegmatite deposits is primarily controlled by Rayleigh-type fractional crystallization, and the source rocks are chemically zoned granites.
Li-Cs-Ta (LCT ) rare-element pegmatites occur as late-stage and highly fractionated bodies at the margins of regionally zoned granite pegmatite fields. The evolution of the granitic pegmatite system, including its rare-metal metallogeny, is often difficult to determine due to complex textures involving variable crystal size and a heterogeneous chemical composition. The Renli-Chuanziyuan pegmatite field (South China) displays a well-developed regional zonation sequence, involving a core of biotite-, two-mica- and muscovite monzogranites (MMs) that grades outward into microcline (K-zone), microcline-albite (K-Na-zone), albite (Na-zone) and albite-spodumene (Na-Li-zone) pegmatites. Monazite and the Th, Ca-end-member (i.e. cheralite) provide valuable age, rare earth element (REE) geochemical and Sm-Nd isotopic data for understanding the regional zoning process within the Renli-Chuanziyuan pegmatite. Monazite (from the MM and the K-, K-Na- and Na-zone pegmatites) and cheralite (from the Na-Li-zone pegmatite) have variable compositions and complex internal microtextures. The monazite and cheralite grains contain irregular areas with subtle heterogeneous BSE response along cracks and grain margins, suggesting that they have experienced alkali-bearing fluid-aided modification. However, these features are rarely seen in monazite from the K-zone pegmatite. Common Pb contamination and/or Pb loss during fluid-aided modification may have disturbed the monazite and cheralite U-Th-Pb isotopic system, due to the differential mobility of U, Th and Pb. The unaltered Na-zone monazite and Na-Li-zone cheralite yielded Th-Pb ages of 140.42 & PLUSMN; 2.30 Ma (2 & sigma;, mean standard weighted deviation (MSWD) = 2.4, n = 14) and 139.58 & PLUSMN; 2.15 Ma (2 & sigma;, MSWD = 2.9, n = 21), respectively. The unaltered MM, K-zone and K-Na-zone monazite yielded Pb-206-U-238 ages of 138.03 & PLUSMN; 2.18 (2 & sigma;, MSWD = 2.5, n = 18), 140.39 & PLUSMN; 2.18 (2 & sigma;, MSWD = 3.0, n = 20) and 140.58 & PLUSMN; 2.14 Ma (2 & sigma;, MSWD = 2.0, n = 52), respectively. These ages for the four pegmatite zones are temporally consistent with a syngenetic origin for the magmatic sequence of biotite-, two-mica- and MM and the pegmatite system and rare-metal (Li-Nb-Ta-Rb-(Cs)-(Be)) mineralization. The Sm-Nd isotopic analyses of the unaltered monazite and cheralite from the MM and four pegmatite zones yield similar initial Nd isotopic composition with & epsilon;Nd-(t) = -9.9 to -7.9, indicating an identical single-source region (i.e. the Neoproterozoic South China lower crust). The Sm/Nd ratios display a gradual decrease across the four pegmatite zones from the unaltered K-zone monazite to Na-Li-zone cheralite, i.e. 0.39-0.63 (avg. = 0.43) for K-zone, 0.29-0.35 (avg. = 0.31) for K-Na-zone, 0.26-0.30 (avg. = 0.28) for Na-zone and 0.21-0.27 (avg. = 0.24) for Na-Li-zone. Such progressive variations suggest their derivation from the same parental magma, which experienced varying degrees of fractionation before the extraction of pegmatitic melts. Comprehensive monazite and cheralite geochemistry, as well as in situ U-Th-Pb and Sm-Nd isotopic results indicate that Rayleigh-type fractional crystallization controls the mineralogical and geochemical evolution from a chemically zoned granite source.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据