4.4 Article

Changes in quality of life over time in patients diagnosed with oral leukoplakia: A prospective longitudinal study

期刊

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 3, 页码 226-231

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jop.13415

关键词

change; longitudinal study; oral leukoplakia; oral potentially malignant disorder; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether quality of life (QoL) scores change over time in individuals diagnosed with oral leukoplakia (OL). The results suggest that QoL scores of OL subjects may improve with time.
Background: Oral leukoplakia (OL) is one of the most prevalent oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMD). Although there is emerging evidence that quality of life (QoL) is impaired in subjects with OL; studies to date are based on single and heterogenous point-in-time assessments. The aim of this study was to ascertain if QoL scores change over time in individuals diagnosed with OL.Methods: Forty-one individuals with OL were administered the Short Generic Health Questionnaire (SF-12) and the discipline-specific Oral Potentially Malignant Disorder Questionnaire (OPMDQ) at four points in time: at the time of clinical diagnosis, at the post-biopsy review (confirmed diagnosis), and at 3- and 6-month follow-up appointments. Responses were compared between the four time points.Results: No significant differences were observed in the SF-12 questionnaire scores over time. However, a general improvement in the participants' life quality was evident over the 6-month period under investigation in the domains of psychological and social well-being (p = 0.0027) and effect of treatment on daily life (p = 0.0317) as well as in the total score (p = 0.0005) of the OPMDQ. Age, gender, medical status, tobacco/alcohol use, lesion site, size, the presence of dysplasia and treatment did not impact QoL scores over time.Conclusions: QoL scores of OL subjects may improve with time. Our results suggest that studies examining QoL in individuals with OL should be controlled for time at which the participants are surveyed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据