4.2 Article

Povidone-Iodine Adverse Effects and Alternatives for Ocular Procedures

期刊

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/jop.2022.0122

关键词

povidone-iodine; ocular surgery; chlorhexidine; antiseptics; adverse effects

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper aims to compile information on the use, safety profile, adverse effects, and possible alternatives of Povidone-iodine (PVI). While the allergic potential to PVI is disputed, there are nonallergic adverse effects of PVI that should not be overlooked. Alternatives to PVI including chlorhexidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide, and octenidine have been identified.
Purpose: Povidone-iodine (PVI), also known as Betadine, is a widely used antiseptic agent used in several fields of medicine. In ophthalmology, it is applied as a preoperative antiseptic to prevent infectious complications that can result from surgical procedures. PVI's safety and efficacy have been extensively studied and represented in the literature; however, the incidence of adverse effects has been reported in conjunction. The aim of this paper is to compile information regarding PVIs use, safety profile, adverse effects, and possible alternatives through a review of the existing literature.Methods: Literature was compiled utilizing the database PubMed and Google Scholar using specified keywords with a total of 86 reviewed articles, after excluding search results that did not meet the inclusion criteria.Results: While the allergic potential to PVI is a highly contested topic, there are several nonallergic adverse effects of PVI that should not be overlooked. These effects include chemical burn, cytotoxic effects, and general patient discomfort. In light of these adverse effects, alternatives to PVI may be considered. However, there has been little research identifying feasible alternatives in preoperative intraocular procedures. Alternatives including chlorhexidine, polyhexamethylene biguanide (polyhexanide), and octenidine were identified as potential substitutes for PVI.Conclusions: Further study is needed to provide robust evidence regarding the efficacy profiles of these alternatives in comparison with PVI and to demonstrate comparable tolerance to PVI in intraocular procedures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据