4.7 Article

Azolylpyrimidinediols as Novel Structural Scaffolds of DNA-Groove Binders against Intractable Acinetobacter baumannii

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 7, 页码 4910-4931

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c02042

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A unique class of antibacterial azolylpyrimidinediols (APDs) and their analogues were developed. Some synthesized compounds showed excellent bacteriostatic potency; especially, triazolylpyrimidinediol (triadol PD) 7a exhibited good anti Acinetobacter baumannii potential with a low MIC of 0.002 mmol/ L. Mechanistic explorations revealed that compound 7a without membrane-targeting ability could decrease metabolic activity, interact with DNA through groove binding action to block DNA replication rather than intercalate into and cleave DNA, and thus inhibit bacterial growth.
A unique class of antibacterial azolylpyrimidinediols (APDs) and their analogues were developed. Some synthesized compounds showed excellent bacteriostatic potency; especially, triazolylpyrimidinediol (triazolyl PD) 7a exhibited good antiAcinetobacter baumannii potential with a low MIC of 0.002 mmol/ L. Triazolyl PD 7a with inconspicuous cytotoxicity and hemolytic activity could eradicate the established biofilm, showed low resistance, and exhibited favorable drug-likeness. Mechanistic explorations revealed that compound 7a without membrane-targeting ability could decrease metabolic activity, interact with DNA through groove binding action to block DNA replication rather than intercalate into and cleave DNA, and thus inhibit bacterial growth. Further computations displayed that the low EHOMO and large energy gap might help triazolyl PD 7a binding to biological targets more easily. Moreover, compound 7a gave appreciable in vivo pharmacokinetic properties and pharmacodynamics. These findings of azolylpyrimidinediols as novel structural scaffolds of DNA-groove binders might imply a large promise for the treatments of Acinetobacter baumannii infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据