4.7 Article

Respiratory syncytial virus surge in 2022 caused by lineages already present before the COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 95, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28830

关键词

molecular epidemiology; phylodynamics; respiratory syncytial virus; sentinel surveillance

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 2022, Austria experienced a severe RSV epidemic that started earlier than usual and affected more pediatric patients in emergency departments. Genomic surveillance and phylogenetic analysis revealed that the surge in the 2022/2023 season was driven by RSV-B, while the previous season was driven by RSV-A. The predominant genotype in the 2022/2023 season, RSV-B strain GB5.0.6a, emerged in late 2019. These findings provide valuable insights into RSV evolution and epidemiology for future monitoring and the development of vaccines and therapeutics.
In 2022, Austria experienced a severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) epidemic with an earlier-than-usual start (Weeks 35/2021-45/2022) and increased numbers of pediatric patients in emergency departments. This surge came 2 years after a season with no cases detected as a result of coronavirus disease 2019 nonpharmaceutical interventions. We analyzed epidemiologic patterns and the phylodynamics of RSV based on approximately 30 800 respiratory specimens collected year-round over 10 years from ambulatory and hospitalized patients from 248 locations in Austria. Genomic surveillance and phylogenetic analysis of 186 RSV-A and 187 RSV-B partial glycoprotein sequences collected from 2018 to 2022 revealed that the 2022/2023 surge was driven by RSV-B in contrast to the surge in the 2021/2022 season that was driven by RSV-A. Whole-genome sequencing and phylodynamic analysis indicated that the RSV-B strain GB5.0.6a was the predominant genotype in the 2022/2023 season and emerged in late 2019. The results provide insight into RSV evolution and epidemiology that will be applicable to future monitoring efforts with the advent of novel vaccines and therapeutics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据