4.7 Article

Deep Learning With Chest Radiographs for Making Prognoses in Patients With COVID-19: Retrospective Cohort Study

期刊

出版社

JMIR PUBLICATIONS, INC
DOI: 10.2196/42717

关键词

COVID-19; deep learning; artificial intelligence; radiography; thoracic; prognosis; AI model; prediction model; clinical outcome; medical imaging; machine learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to develop and validate a prediction model using chest radiography (CXR) and clinical variables to predict clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients. The combined model using an AI model and clinical information showed good performance in predicting ARDS and need for oxygen supplementation in COVID-19 patients.
Background: An artificial intelligence (AI) model using chest radiography (CXR) may provide good performance in making prognoses for COVID-19. Objective: We aimed to develop and validate a prediction model using CXR based on an AI model and clinical variables to predict clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included patients hospitalized for COVID-19 at multiple COVID-19 medical centers between February 2020 and October 2020. Patients at Boramae Medical Center were randomly classified into training, validation, and internal testing sets (at a ratio of 8:1:1, respectively). An AI model using initial CXR images as input, a logistic regression model using clinical information, and a combined model using the output of the AI model (as CXR score) and clinical information were developed and trained to predict hospital length of stay (LOS) <= 2 weeks, need for oxygen supplementation, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The models were externally validated in the Korean Imaging Cohort of COVID-19 data set for discrimination and calibration. Results: The AI model using CXR and the logistic regression model using clinical variables were suboptimal to predict hospital LOS <= 2 weeks or the need for oxygen supplementation but performed acceptably in the prediction of ARDS (AI model area under the curve [AUC] 0.782, 95% CI 0.720-0.845; logistic regression model AUC 0.878, 95% CI 0.838-0.919). The combined model performed better in predicting the need for oxygen supplementation (AUC 0.704, 95% CI 0.646-0.762) and ARDS (AUC 0.890, 95% CI 0.853-0.928) compared to the CXR score alone. Both the AI and combined models showed good calibration for predicting ARDS (P=.079 and P=.859). Conclusions: The combined prediction model, comprising the CXR score and clinical information, was externally validated as having acceptable performance in predicting severe illness and excellent performance in predicting ARDS in patients with COVID-19.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据