4.6 Article

Growth and assessment of optical and non-linear optical properties of lithium sulphamate single crystal for optoelectronic applications

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium sulphamate single crystals were grown by slow evaporation solution growth method and analyzed using various spectroscopic techniques to assess their structural and optical properties. Powder-X-ray diffraction and FT-IR were used to determine the structural parameters, while Raman spectroscopic analysis described the Raman bands assignments. UV-vis spectroscopy thoroughly investigated the transmittance percentage, and Tauc's plot was used to calculate the bandgap. Photoluminescence spectroscopy determined the emission spectrum, and time-resolved photoluminescence observed the decay rate. Z-scan technique examined the nonlinear optical behavior, THz spectroscopy analyzed the absorbance behavior in THz region, and DSC and TGA/DTA analysis examined the thermal characteristics of the crystal.
Lithium sulphamate single crystals have been grown by the slow evaporation solution growth method and were analyzed via various spectroscopic techniques to assess their structural and optical properties. The grown crystal ingot was first subjected to powder-X-ray diffraction and FT-IR to determine its structural parameters. Raman spectroscopic analysis was also carried out to describe the corresponding Raman bands assignments of grown crystal. The transmittance percentage of the crystal was thoroughly investigated by UV-vis spectroscopy and the bandgap was calculated using the Tauc's plot. Further, photoluminescence spectroscopy determined the emission spectrum, and the decay rate was observed by the time-resolved photoluminescence. In addition, the Z-scan technique further examined the nonlinear optical behavior of the titled crystal. The THz spectroscopy was also performed to analyze its absorbance behavior in the THz region. The thermal characteristics of the crystal were examined by DSC and TGA/ DTA analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据