4.7 Article

Effect of grain size on iron-boride nanoglasses

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 116-123

出版社

JOURNAL MATER SCI TECHNOL
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2022.09.025

关键词

Colloidal; Nanoparticles; Interface; Nanoindentation; Micropillar; Plasticity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metallic nanoglasses with different grain sizes were fabricated via compaction and sintering of colloidal synthesized amorphous nanoparticles. Nanocrystals were found to form within the nanoglasses during compaction, and higher nanocrystal density correlated with increased plasticity and decreased yield strength.
Metallic nanoglasses are made of amorphous grains that are separated by lower-density amorphous boundaries, which have been proposed to enhance plasticity through the deflection of cracks and shear bands at interfaces. It has been difficult to experimentally control grain size and interfacial structure to understand their roles in plastic deformation. Here, we fabricate bulk nanoglasses via compaction and sintering of colloidally synthesized amorphous iron-boride nanoparticles. These nanoglasses have amor-phous grains with diameters from 116 nm to 576 nm and were tested using nanoindentation and mi-cropillar compressions. The nanoglass with a grain size of 576 nm shows the highest elastic modulus and hardness of 101 GPa and 7.4 GPa, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy reveals that nanocrys-tals form within the nanoglasses during compaction. Higher nanocrystal density correlates with higher nanoparticle crystallization enthalpy, an increase in plasticity, and a decrease in yield strength. Plastic strain of 5.0%, yield strength of 3.8 GPa, and ultimate compressive strength of 2.7-3.8 GPa were achieved. We show that the compaction of colloidal metallic glass nanoparticles results in robust bulk samples, with mechanical properties similar to that of other iron-based bulk metallic glasses.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The editorial office of Journal of Materials Science & Technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据