4.5 Article

Direct calibration of indenter tip geometry by optical surface topography measuring instruments

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS RESEARCH
卷 38, 期 13, 页码 3336-3348

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1557/s43578-023-01063-0

关键词

Instrumented indentation test; Nanoindentation; Calibration; Measurement uncertainty; Indenter geometry; Area shape function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Instrumented indentation test (IIT) is a depth-sensing hardness test that allows nano- to macro-mechanical characterization of surface mechanical properties. Indenter tip geometry calibration is crucial for ensuring traceability and applicability of IIT. This study proposes a practical direct calibration method using optical surface topography measuring instruments, overcoming the limitations of expensive and impractical direct calibration by AFM or less accurate indirect methods.
Instrumented indentation test (IIT) is a depth-sensing hardness test allowing nano- to macro-mechanical characterisation of surface mechanical properties. Indenter tip geometry calibration allows nano-scale characterisation, overcoming the limits of conventional hardness tests. Calibration is critical to ensure IIT traceability and applicability for quality verification in manufacturing processes. The accuracy and precision of IIT are mainly affected by the indenter tip geometry calibration. State-of-the-art indenter tip geometry calibration reports either direct calibration by AFM, which is highly expensive and unpractical for industry, or indirect calibration methods, which are less accurate, precise and robust. This work proposes a practical, direct calibration method for IIT indenter tip geometry by optical surface topography measuring instruments. The methodology is complemented by uncertainty evaluation. The proposed approach is applied to Berkovich and Vickers indenters and its advantages are proven in terms of accuracy and precision of mechanical characterisation on metallic and ceramic material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据