4.4 Article

Eco-friendly green composites reinforced with recycled polyethylene for engineering applications

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10163-023-01701-z

关键词

Polymer-matrix composites; Recycling; Mechanical properties; Stress concentration; Scanning electron microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research presents a green composite material reinforced with recycled polyethylene waste for applications in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering industry. The composite with 40% laterite and 60% PE showed the highest compressive strength, flexural strength and fracture toughness.
Polyethylene (PE) and cement are industrial products that promote environmental pollution. These products when exposed on the landfill have tremendous effects on the lives of humanity and other living creatures, including animals. Therefore, this research presents the results of experimental and theoretical modeling of green composites (without the inclusion of cement) reinforced with recycled polyethylene waste for applications in the Mechanical and Civil Engineering industry. The composites are produced using different weight fractions of laterite and molten PE mixed homogeneously to produce unique green composites with excellent mechanical properties. The green composite with 40 wt.% laterites and 60 wt.% PE exhibited the highest compressive strength, flexural strength and fracture toughness of 25 MPa, 7.3 MPa and 0.6MPa root m, respectively. Additionally, the green composite recorded maximum yield stress of similar to 2MP. The maximum yield stress of the green composites falls under the minimum range of yield stress for traditional concrete structures. The SEM images reveal evidence of bonding and ligament bridging in the green composites reinforced with 40 wt.% laterites and 60 wt.% PE. The probability distribution plots show that the polyethylene in the green composites follows the Weibull distribution with low Anderson Darling Statics and p-values greater than significance level of 5%. [GRAPHICS] .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据