4.2 Article

Efficient geomorphological mapping based on geographic information systems and remote sensing data: an example from Jena, Germany

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAPS
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/17445647.2023.2172468

关键词

Geomorphological map; ArcGIS; remote sensing; Jena; Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed geomorphological map (1:5000-scale) of a middle mountainous area in Jena, Germany, using geographic information systems (GIS) and high-resolution digital data. The map features were extracted by manually interpreting the combination of different data sources using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. By incorporating the visual interpretation of multidirectional hillshade and land surface parameters (LSPs) composite maps, we were able to systematically delineate landforms and geomorphological process domains.
We present a detailed geomorphological map (1:5000-scale) of a middle mountainous area in Jena, Germany. To overcome limitations and to extend the possibility of manually digital mapping in a structural way, we propose an approach using geographic information systems (GIS) and high-resolution digital data. The geomorphological map features were extracted by manually interpreting and analyzing the combination of different data sources using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data. A combination of topographic and geological maps, digital orthophotos (DOPs), Google Earth images, field investigations, and derivatives from digital terrain models (DTMs) revealed that it is possible to generate the geomorphologic features involved in classical mapping approaches. LiDAR-DTM and land surface parameters (LSPs) can provide better results when incorporating the visual interpretation of multidirectional hillshade and LSP composite maps.Findings enabled us to systematically delineate landforms and geomorphological process domains. We suggest that further use of digital data should be undertaken to support analysis and applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据