4.1 Article

A Quartz Crystal Microbalance (QCM) Study on the Formation of Aqueous κ-Carrageenan-Chitosan Composite Bilayers with NaCl and Graphene Oxide

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2023.2216073

关键词

QCM; polyelectrolyte multilayers; LBL deposition; biofilms; graphene oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomaterials and thin biofilms are important in the medical, food and pharmaceutical industries. The Quartz crystal microbalance measurement technique is used to monitor the formation of thin films. This study investigated the deposition of polyelectrolyte multilayers on a gold surface using kappa-carrageenan and chitosan solutions. The effects of NaCl and graphene oxide addition on the mass of the deposited films were also explored.
Biomaterials and thin biofilms play a fundamental role in the medical, food and pharmaceutical industries. The Quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) measurement technique is one of the attractive techniques which have been used for monitoring the thin-film formation process. In the current work described here, kappa-carrageenan and chitosan solutions were used for the layer-by-layer (LBL) deposition of polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs) on the gold surface of a 5 MHz AT-cut (thickness-shear mode) quartz crystal in a flow module. A sensitive QCM system was designed to detect 0.1 Hz differences in the resonance frequency (Delta f) and 10(-7) changes in the energy dissipation (Delta D) values, which are the measures of the deposited mass and the film rigidity, respectively. Negatively charged carrageenan and positively charged chitosan biomolecules in the solutions were used to build up sequential and very thin bilayers on the modified gold surface. The effects of NaCl and graphene oxide (GO) addition on the mass of the deposited films were also investigated. Intermolecular interactions between the biopolymer chains, Na+ cations and GO sheets were explained by interactions between molecules, such as electrostatic forces and hydrogen bondings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据