4.7 Article

Longitudinal Assessment of the Prevalence of Actinic Keratosis and Extensive Risk Factor Evaluation: An Update from the Rotterdam Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY
卷 143, 期 11, 页码 2193-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2023.02.042

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population-based studies on actinic keratoses (AKs) are limited, but this study provides valuable insights on the prevalence, risk factors, and longitudinal outlook of AK. The study found that factors such as male sex, age, lighter hair and eye color, baldness, genetic risk score, and digital photoaging measures were associated with an increased risk of AK. Interestingly, cigarette smokers had a lower risk of AK, and there was no difference in AK presence between treated and untreated participants during follow-up.
Population-based studies available to analyze the prevalence, risk factors, and longitudinal outlook of actinic keratoses (AKs) are limited. These features mentioned earlier were assessed using Rotterdam study participants aged >= 40 years who underwent a full-body skin examination by a dermatology-trained physician. ORs with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for the associations between risk factors and the presence of AK. Among 8,239 eligible participants, the prevalence of one or more AKs was 21.1% (95% confidence interval = 20.2-22.0) and was higher in men. Male sex, age, lighter hair and eye color, baldness, genetic risk score, and digital photoaging measures (digitally assessed pigmented spots, telangiectasias, and global facial wrinkling) had a positive association with AK. Cigarette smokers had reduced odds of having AK, with current smokers having the lowest risk. Among patients with two AK assessments, there was no difference in the presence of AK during follow-up between treated and untreated participants. In conclusion, genetic risk score and digital photoaging measures showed associations with increased lesion count. At the individual level, patients were most likely to decrease in AK severity group over time, possibly regardless of whether or not participants were treated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据