4.5 Article

An isothermal enzymatic recombinase amplification (ERA) assay for rapid and accurate detection of Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei infection in shrimp

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVERTEBRATE PATHOLOGY
卷 197, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jip.2023.107895

关键词

Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei; Enzymatic recombinase amplification; Spore wall protein gene

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a rapid and sensitive detection method for the prawn parasitic disease EHP was developed and evaluated. The EHP-ERA assay could diagnose EHP within 20 minutes at 42 degrees C, with a detection limit of 10 copies/mu L.
Enterocytozoon hepatopenaei (EHP) is a kind of microsporidian parasite belonging to fungi, and poses a serious threat to prawn farmers. Due to the lack of effective treatments for EHP, the establishment of a rapid and sensitive detection method would be beneficial to the control and prevention of this prawn parasitic disease. In this study, an isothermal enzymatic recombinase amplification (EHP-ERA) assay that could diagnose EHP within 20 min at 42 degrees C was developed and evaluated. The determined final concentrations of primers and probe in the reaction system were 400 nM and 120 nM, respectively. EHP-ERA was carried out within 13 min (24.31 +/- 0.37 Ct) with a detection limit of 10 copies/mu L. The results of specificity test showed that EHP-ERA had no cross -reactivity with white spot syndrome virus (WSSV), Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain causing acute hepatopancre-atic necrosis disease (VpAHPND), and infectious hypodermal and hematopoietic necrosis virus (IHHNV) and specific pathogen free (SPF) shrimp. Using 32 clinical samples, the practical diagnostic results of EHP-ERA was consistent with nested PCR and real-time PCR (qPCR) under the premise of less time-consuming and simpler operation. In summary, we established a simple, rapid, and effective ERA assay for the detection of EHP, which had great potential to be widely used in both lab and practical usage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据