4.4 Article

Design of sustainable campus modal in Istanbul Gelisim University using fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods(1)

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 45, 期 2, 页码 3393-3415

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-223778

关键词

Sustainable campus; fuzzy multicriteria decision making; fuzzy AHP; fuzzy TOPSIS; fuzzy ELECTRE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the sustainable campus criteria and the necessary changes for becoming an ecologically sustainable campus. The research assesses the sustainable campus design principles and indicators using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods at Istanbul Gelisim University. Model-based methods are used to evaluate the sustainable campus performance, which sets this study apart from others in the literature. Three different Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods, Fuzzy-AHP, Fuzzy-TOPSIS, and Fuzzy-ELECTRE, are used, and a common solution is obtained by combining their results.
This study aims to investigate the sustainable campus criteria, the variations made or require to be done to become an ecologically sustainable campus. In this context, the major goal of the research is assessing the sustainable campus design principles and indicators, setting the targets and deciding the precedencies with the Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods (MCDM) for the sustainable campus design at Istanbul Gelisim University. In this study, model-based methods have been used to evaluate the sustainable campus performance of universities. In this respect, the study differs from other studies in the literature. Another difference of this study is that three different Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods has been used, these methods are Fuzzy-AHP, Fuzzy-TOPSIS and Fuzzy-ELECTRE. All three have different inference mechanisms. A common solution has been obtained by using the results of these three different Fuzzy-MCDM methods as hybrid dominance and superiority criteria. Here, the Copeland method, which takes the superiority criterion as a reference, has been used in the options where we could not provide the dominance criterion. At the end of this study, a recommendation report has been prepared according to these results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据