4.3 Article

Ecospaces of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition: The archaeofaunal record of the Iberian Peninsula

期刊

JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2023.103331

关键词

Mediterranean bioregion; Euro-Siberian bioregion; Compositional analysis; Zooarchaeology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this article, the archaeofaunal record of Iberia dating between 60 and 30 ka is analyzed to explore potential differences between Neanderthal and anatomically modern human interactions with the environment. The study finds no significant compositional difference between Neanderthal and anatomically modern mammalian faunal assemblages, but anatomically modern human-affiliated assemblages exhibit stronger bioclimatic regionalization, indicating a potential difference in site occupation duration or foraging mobility between the two groups.
The rich archaeofaunal record of Iberia provides a means of exploring potential differences between Neanderthal and anatomically modern human interactions with the environment. In this article, we present an analysis of Iberian archaeofaunas dating between 60 and 30 ka to explore if, how, and why the faunal ecospaces of Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans differed. We test for impacts of chronology (as a proxy for Neanderthal and anatomically modern human exploitation) and environmental regionalization (using bioclimatic regions) on archaeofaunal composition, using a combination of cluster (unweighted pair-group method using arithmetic averages) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Our chronological analysis finds no significant compositional difference between Neanderthal and anatomically modern mammalian faunal assemblages; however, bioclimatic regionalization is stronger in anatomically modern human-affiliated assemblages than in Neanderthal ones, a finding that may indicate a difference in site occupation duration or foraging mobility between Neanderthals and anatomically modern humans. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据