4.7 Article

Impact of microplastics on lead-contaminated riverine sediments: Based on the enzyme activities, DOM fractions, and bacterial community structure

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 447, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.130763

关键词

Microplastics; Sediments properties; Lead; Microbial community; Combined exposure

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the impacts of microplastics on sediment properties and bacterial community structure in heavy metal-contaminated sediments were investigated. It was found that the addition of microplastics decreased the adsorption amount of Pb(II) by sediments and influenced sediment enzyme activities, DOM fractions, and Pb bioavailability. Furthermore, microplastics were observed to alter sediment bacterial community structures.
Microplastics (MPs) are able to interact with diverse contaminants in sediments. However, the impacts of MPs on sediment properties and bacterial community structure in heavy metal-contaminated sediments remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the adsorption of Pb(II) by sediment-MPs mixtures and the effects of different concentration MPs on sediment enzyme activities, DOM fractions, and Pb bioavailability in riverine sediments, and further explored the response of sediment microbial community to Pb in the presence of MPs. The results indicated that the addition of MPs significantly decreased the adsorption amount of Pb(II) by sediments, especially decreased by 12.6% at 10% MPs treatment. Besides, the changes in enzyme activities, DOM fractions exhibited dose-dependent effects of MPs. The higher level of MPs (5% and 10%) tends to transform Pb into more bioavailable fractions in sediments. Also, MPs amendment was observed to alter sediment bacterial community structures, and community differences were evident in the uncontaminated and lead-contaminated sediments. Therein, significant increase of Bacteroidota, Proteobacteria and decrease of Firmicutes abundance in Pb

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据