4.1 Article

Critical components of genomic medicine practice for non-genetics healthcare professionals: Genetic counselors' perspectives and implications for medical education

期刊

JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1689

关键词

clinical practice; education; genetic counselors; genetics services; genomic medicine; non-genetics healthcare professionals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research highlights gaps in knowledge and clinical practices in genetics/genomics among non-genetics healthcare professionals (NGHPs) who provide genetic services. Genetic counselors (GCs) have insight into the critical components of knowledge and practices needed by NGHPs. Most GCs disagreed with NGHPs providing genetic services, but endorsed the importance of interpretation of genetic test results, understanding implications of results, collaboration with genetics professionals, knowledge of risks and benefits to testing, and recognizing indications for genetic testing as critical components for NGHPs. Recommendations include educating NGHPs through case-based continuing medical education and increasing collaboration with genetics professionals.
Genetic services are increasingly provided by non-genetics healthcare professionals (NGHPs) with minimal formal training in genetics/genomics. Research demonstrates gaps in knowledge and clinical practices in genetics/genomics among NGHPs, but there is a lack of consensus on the specific knowledge needed by NGHPs to effectively provide genetic services. As clinical genetics professionals, genetic counselors (GCs) have insight into the critical components of genetics/genomics knowledge and practices needed by NGHPs. This study explored GCs' beliefs regarding whether NGHPs should provide genetic services and identified GCs' perceptions of the components of knowledge and clinical practice in genetics/genomics that are most critical for NGHPs providing genetic services. Two hundred and forty GCs completed an online quantitative survey with 17 participating in a follow-up qualitative interview. Descriptive statistics and cross-comparisons were generated for survey data. Interview data were analyzed using an inductive qualitative method for cross-case analysis. Most GCs disagreed with NGHPs providing genetic services, but beliefs varied widely, ranging from disagreement due to perceived gaps in knowledge or clinical skills to acceptance of NGHPs providing genetic services due to limited access to genetics professionals. Across survey and interview data, GCs endorsed the interpretation of genetic test results, understanding implications of results, collaboration with genetics professionals, knowledge of the risks and benefits to testing, and recognizing indications for genetic testing as critical components of knowledge and clinical practice for NGHPs. Several recommendations for improving the provision of genetic services were provided by respondents including educating NGHPs to provide genetic services through case-based continuing medical education and increasing collaboration between NGHPs and genetics professionals. As GCs are healthcare providers with experience and vested interests in educating NGHPs, their perspectives can help inform the creation of continuing medical education to ensure patients' access to high-quality genomic medicine care from providers of varying backgrounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据